The United States Constitution

Introduction The United States’ constitution has stood the test of time since its adoption in late 18th century. During 17th century, Americans were under colonial rule that denied them rights and powers to govern themselves. Then, Americans fought for their independence gradually by demanding their recognition and inclusion into the colonial government that had oppressed for quite some time.Advertising We will write a custom assessment sample on The United States Constitution specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Colonialists flooded the US in early 17th century from various parts of the world, majorly Europe because they were escaping religious persecution and in search of expansive land for agriculture. Under oppression, Americans made several initiatives in a bid to emancipate themselves and these initiatives culminated into independence in 1776. According to Garrett, in 1765, 13 colonies met to discuss the violation of fund amental rights and in 1774 and 1775, first and second continental congress respectively resolved to have independence (12). In 1776, the United States got its independence and adopted a new constitution in 1787. This constitution has become the legal basis for the present government. Despite the fact that the formulation of the United States’ constitution dates back to more than 230 years ago, it is still remarkably viable in the modern government. The preamble of the United States’ constitution envisages a perfect union of diverse states based on common defence, liberty, justice and tranquillity. Even though the preamble dates back to more than two centuries ago, it formed the basis of federal form of government that still exists today. American government has a federal model of government that other countries are trying to emulate for it is a perfect union of diverse states. Garrett argues that the United States’ constitution has stood the test of time because it established federal government as it exists currently (19). The existence of the federal government reflects viability of the United States’ constitution in modern governance. Therefore, current union of states has its basis in the United States’ constitution, which envisaged perfect union and how federal government functions and relates with central government. The United States’ constitution is still viable in modern governance because it has an elastic clause that makes it flexible and adaptive to modern changes, which are consistent with new forms of governance. According to Section 8 of Article I, Congress has powers to make necessary amendments that are essential and consistent with the United States’ constitution.Advertising Looking for assessment on political sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The United States’ constitution is a legal framework that anchors several amendme nts and provisions in view of evolving legal issues of governance in the modern world. Wedes argues that, the elastic clause is particularly relevant to modern governance because it does not only give power to Congress to conduct necessary and appropriate amendments, but also ensures that the constitution is in tandem with dynamic needs of governance (p.1). For instance, Congress has made several amendments in modes of taxation, regulation of commerce and security issues with regard to terrorism. Thus, elastic clause has made the United States’ constitution remain viable and reliable in current governance. Moreover, the amendment process of the United States’ constitution is decidedly stringent to protect it from undue mutilation and changes that would make it lose its viability over time. The United States’ constitution has the first ten amendments that form basis of human rights, which are inalienable. From independence, the first ten amendments have remained and are truly viable as they are provisions that stipulate inherent and immutable rights of every citizen in America. For instance, the first amendment to the United States’ constitution provides and guarantees freedom of expression, religion, association and petition. The first amendment assured Americans that the federal government will protect and secure their rights for posterity. In addition, Garlinger states that, the fourteenth amendment to the United States’ constitution forbids any state from making or enforcing any law that restrict the privileges or deprive life, liberty and property (p.32). Hence, in spite of numerous attempts to amend the constitution, the amendments to United States’ constitution are central to human rights and have become the cornerstone in advocacy of human rights, thus still viable in the present government. Supreme Court of the United States also has powers to review the constitutionality of statutes, amendments and treaties th at congress makes to guarantee their consistency with the constitution. According to Prakash and Yoo, Marbury v. Madison (1803), did set a precedent, which gave powers to Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of congressional statutes and amendments (890). Currently, Supreme Court still has powers to review and determine the constitutionality of statutes and amendments of the Congress. Thus, Supreme Court has a considerable role in ensuring that the United States’ constitution remains viable and consistent across all ages except few amendments that enhance its application in modern governance.Advertising We will write a custom assessment sample on The United States Constitution specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Conclusion Although the United States’ constitution is over 200 years old, it is still highly relevant in modern society. The constitution provides a legal framework, which anchors several provisions a nd amendments that occur over a period. The legal framework of the United States’ constitution has relatively remained constant for over 200 years, and is still relevant and viable because it is flexible in adopting new judicial and governing reforms. It is quite evident that the United States’ constitution been stable for a long period because of federal form of government, elastic clause, stringent amendment process and judicial review, all of which attest its viability and relevance in the modern United States. Works Cited Garlinger, Paul. â€Å"United States Constitution: The Amendments.† New York University  Law Review 2.4 (2009): 30-34. Garrett, Sandy. United States History, Constitution and Government. New York: Harcourt Publisher, 2005. Prakash, Saikrishna, and Yoo, John. â€Å"The Origins of Judicial Review.† Chicago Law  Review, 2003: 887-933. Wedes, Samuel. â€Å"A Living Constitution, the United States Constitution: Does It Stand The Test of Time?† Government, 2006: 1-33. This assessment on The United States Constitution was written and submitted by user Emmalee Herring to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Modern cars and classics essays

Modern cars and classics essays Cars, we all have or want one. We all can be put in one of two categories, a classic car lover or a lover of the new modern marvels. The question is classic or new? Well here are a few thoughts of mine that might help you decide the pros and the cons of both the classic car and the newer models. Modern cars are more gas efficient, therefor saving you money at the pump. They are also made with many man made materials instead of steel, and are built with parts that wear down within a few years. To make a modern car as powerful as its forefather, they invented the turbo. Modern cars are cute, get great miles per gallons of gas, and handle excellent. In a lot of ways are safer than classics. Modern cars are all Equipped with seat belts and air bags, where as classics did not. Alot of the manufacturers use recycled materials in their vehicles. In doing that it makes the car more affordable and its great for the environment. Classic cars were built to last, with hardy solid steel frames. So when or if you get in an accident they wont crumble and just fall apart. The proof is in the fact that there are so many classics still around. Classic cars also go up in value as long as they are taken care of, while a new car depreciates as soon as you drive it off the lot. The V-8 is the heart of those classics that keeps them running strong. But with everything there is a problem with classics. With some of the older models repair can get quite expensive. It can get expensive because parts can be hard to find and some mechanics dont even know where so start. You could also call some of the oldies gas hogs; the V-8 likes to drink it up. A lot of the manufacturers also used lead paint for their vehicles, fore which is bad for us and the environment. As you can see there are a lot of things to weight out when buying a vehicle. Either a classic beauty with classic lines and pure muscle or a modern car wit...

Protective equipment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Protective equipment - Essay Example emicals used in their respective industries, and may do not provide enough knowledge to their employees on the ways to handle those chemicals, their corrosive by-products, and importantly reactive hazards. This may result in catastrophic consequences such as environmental hazards, damage to physical property, serious injury, and even death. So, using two case studies of reactive hazards, the discussion will be about the fact that reactive hazards are a serious concern that should be better controlled by the chemical industry with the use of protective equipments and better regulated by regulating bodies. The first case study focuses on an incident in early 2000s at Philadelphia based chemical manufacturing company, Rohm and Hass, now Dow Chemicals. In the company, the hot acidic vapours of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and sulphur trioxide( SO3) from the steam powered blower were treated and cooled using two absorbers (Ness, 2004). The first one is an acidic absorber and the other is a caustic scrubber containing polypropylene packing. Water from recirculation pumps which was steam powered and backed up electrically was used to cool the absorbers. In case of high temperature detection in the absorbers, the flow of SO2 vapours was shut down with the help of a safety instrumented function (Ness, 2004). On the day of the incident, the recirculation pumps were tripped off due to electrical power failure. As a result the water flow to the scrubber was interfered. However, the SO2 and SO3 blower continued to feed the system because it was steam powered. This continued for several minutes until a high temperature in the absorbers were noticed by the workers. Unfortunately the temperature values showed by the absorbers were within the safe range of operation of the system (Ness, 2004). At this time, the acid recirculation pumps were restarted showing abnormal pH values, alarming the workers who then shut down the SO2/ SO3 blowers. Investigations showed that the polypropylene